Thursday, January 5, 2012

POSSIBLE SPOILER FOR THE HOBBIT: THERE AND BACK AGAIN???? (Empire)

Some Speculation On The Hobbit Finale
Benedict Cumberbatch reveals tidbit?

05 January 2012 | Written by Helen O'Hara | Source: Exclusive

Some Speculation On The Hobbit Finale
 



















(This is way over my head, guys, but that's not hard)

The following is both complete conjecture and a possible spoiler for The Hobbit: There And Back Again, so please think carefully before continuing. But when we spoke to Benedict Cumberbatch on set of Sherlock a little while back, we asked him about his roles in Peter Jackson's new epic, and he said something that may very well be a spoiler, so let's discuss that just a bit.

Cumberbatch said of his role," I’m playing Smaug through motion-capture and voicing the Necromancer, which is a character in the Five Legions War or something which I’m meant to understand. He’s not actually in the original Hobbit. It’s something [Peter Jackson]’s taken from Lord Of The Rings that he wants to put in there."

Now those familiar with the book will notice immediately the big new piece of information here. Assuming that Cumberbatch does mean the Battle of Five Armies (which seems safe), then this points to one way that Peter Jackson and co. have expanded the book's story to fill two films, and provide a more seamless link to The Lord Of The Rings.

Readers will know that the Necromancer is Sauron, and that Gandalf disappears halfway through (the book of) The Hobbit to lead a coalition force and drive the Necromancer out of his Mirkwood stronghold. But in the book they dispatch the Necromancer back to (as it turns out) Mordor well before the Battle of Five Armies. Here, however, it looks like he's going to turn up to the finale in person, presumably at the head of the goblin and Warg army, and face Gandalf's team there.

If that is the case, it's a narratively neat way to combine the two story threads, that of Bilbo and the dwarves and the other following Gandalf and his team. It also gives the goblins a stronger motivation to suddenly turn up: in the book, they're avenging the earlier death of one of their leaders and (like all the other armies present) hoping to get their grubby hands on the dragon's hoard. If they're incited or led by Sauron, however, their actions will hang more coherently with their behaviour later in Lord Of The Rings.

Of course, this is all just speculation for now. We'll know more when we see The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey this December 14, and see for sure with the release of There And Back Again in 2013.

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=32799

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Cumberbatch could not have been less clear, could he??

Not sure I would put money on this based only on a vague sentence, but it is true The Unfinished Tales show Gandalf is afraid Sauron will try to use the dragon for his own ends, and encourages Thorin to go and get rid of the beast before that can happen. There is no hint of this in the actual Hobbit book, only that there is a vague threat called the Necromancer in a forest somewhere, and by the end of the book, he is less of a threat due to the actions of the White Council.

I suppose I can see these two story lines meeting without breaking faith with the lore too badly.

Karen V. Wasylowski said...

I wish I could understand all this. Thanks for trying to clear it up.